Friday, October 23, 2009

They Did It Deliberately.

The massive wave of immigration that has swamped Britain in recent decades was not some fluke of economics and poor government policy ... it was a consciously designed effort by the Left to remake Britain's ethic demography to better favor multiculturalist dogma.

Huge increases in immigration over the past decade were a deliberate attempt to engineer a more multicultural Britain, a former Government adviser said yesterday.

Andrew Neather, a speechwriter who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, said Labour's relaxation of controls was a plan to 'open up the UK to mass migration'.

As well as bringing in hundreds of thousands to plug labour market gaps, there was also a 'driving political purpose' behind immigration policy, he claimed.

Ministers hoped to change the country radically and 'rub the Right's nose in diversity'. But Mr Neather said senior Labour figures were reluctant to discuss the policy, fearing it would alienate its 'core working-class vote'.

On Question Time, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour's immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.

Writing in the Evening Standard, Mr Neather revealed the 'major shift' in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office.

The published version promoted the labour-market case for immigration but Mr Neather said unpublished versions contained additional reasons.

'Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

'I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended - even if this wasn't its main purpose - to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.' The 'deliberate policy', from late 2000 until 'at least February last year', when the new points-based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

So the oft-repeated conservative joke that leftist governments in the UK and USA were trying to "elect a new people" (i.e. recast the nation's ethnic balance by government policy) was, in fact, perfectly accurate. The Labor Party set about to deliberately diminish the native Anglo-Saxon population of Britain in order to "diversify" the population in accordance with their radical leftist ideology. And, of course, they didn't admit their true goals to the people. It was a conspiracy against the British people.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: 'Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite. Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock-up but a conspiracy. They were right.

'This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage.'

The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: 'We welcome this statement which the whole country knows to be true.

'It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain.'

Now, does anyone think that the leftists who have dictated US immigration policy for 40 years - with the willing acquiesence of the so-called conservative movement and GOP (who have been in the thrall of the left-leaning neocons for the better part of three decades) - don't harbor similar designs on the demography of the US?

1 Comments:

At 6:09 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The "nativists" have been right about the left's intentions all along. Pat Buchanan, God bless him, has been right since he started.


In my opinion, the left's dream country (the Soviet Union) failed, so they threw their energies into multiculturalism ("If I cant beat you, I'll invite the dysfunctional world to your islands and call you racist endlessly if you resist), and radical environmentalsim ("We will throw sand in the gears of your economies and weaken you against competition), and global-financialism ("We will outsource your middle class, and insource competition for your middle class in an effort to hollow out the west's most ardent supporters, while making the very victims of these policies pay for it).


Left wingers are like intellectual suicide bombers attacking the host countries in which they live, probably because of their resentment of their social/financial place within those countries. They embrace "the other" as a way at getting back at the well-adjusted winners within their own nations.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home